<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s new in the Fx Tree in 6.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.softimageblog.com/archives/130/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.softimageblog.com/archives/130#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=whats-new-in-the-fx-tree-in-60</link>
	<description>People and thoughts behind Softimage in production...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:23:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andres Eguiguren</title>
		<link>http://www.softimageblog.com/archives/130/comment-page-1#comment-9989</link>
		<dc:creator>Andres Eguiguren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 13:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xsi-blog.com/?p=130#comment-9989</guid>
		<description>Hey,

Great to see that the FxTree gets some attention. Any chance to get updated tools or the possibility to use AfterEffects pluggins? as the Painterly and such are a bit outdated /limited

Thanks for keeping the FxTree alive.

Andres
Old Eddie user</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,</p>
<p>Great to see that the FxTree gets some attention. Any chance to get updated tools or the possibility to use AfterEffects pluggins? as the Painterly and such are a bit outdated /limited</p>
<p>Thanks for keeping the FxTree alive.</p>
<p>Andres<br />
Old Eddie user</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luc-Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.softimageblog.com/archives/130/comment-page-1#comment-9935</link>
		<dc:creator>Luc-Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 23:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xsi-blog.com/?p=130#comment-9935</guid>
		<description>you shouldn&#039;&#039;t need to use .ct files, which are just uncompressed floating point images.  The OpenEXR format has the same capabilities, but in a smaller footprint</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you shouldn&#8221;t need to use .ct files, which are just uncompressed floating point images.  The OpenEXR format has the same capabilities, but in a smaller footprint</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefano Jannuzzo</title>
		<link>http://www.softimageblog.com/archives/130/comment-page-1#comment-9891</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefano Jannuzzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 09:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xsi-blog.com/?p=130#comment-9891</guid>
		<description>Tx Luc-Eric.
What about .ct ? Any support for negative rgb (which would be handy for managing point passes and such)? Since you don&#039;&#039;t mention it, I guess the answer is no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tx Luc-Eric.<br />
What about .ct ? Any support for negative rgb (which would be handy for managing point passes and such)? Since you don&#8221;t mention it, I guess the answer is no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Caron</title>
		<link>http://www.softimageblog.com/archives/130/comment-page-1#comment-9865</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Caron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 01:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xsi-blog.com/?p=130#comment-9865</guid>
		<description>always great to hear &quot;behind the scenes&quot; about the work done and being done to Softimage&#124;XSI...

Thanks for sharing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>always great to hear &#8220;behind the scenes&#8221; about the work done and being done to Softimage|XSI&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
